MATT ZOLLER SEITZ: HOMELAND: Best new show of the fall?

MATT ZOLLER SEITZ: HOMELAND: Best new show of the fall?


Showtime's "Manchurian Candidate"-style CIA thriller pushes against the cliches of espionage TV

By Matt Zoller Seitz
Press Play contributor

The best new show of the fall debuts tonight — and I’m as surprised to be writing that as you are to be reading it, given that the show in question, Homeland, airs on Showtime (Sundays 10 p.m./9 Central), stars Claire Danes as a CIA analyst, is brought to you by a couple of the producers of 24, and sounds as though it could have been pitched as The Manchurian Candidate: The Series.

But set that aside, if you can, and look at what’s on-screen, because it’ll reward your attention. Very loosely based on the Israeli TV series “Prisoners of War,” it’s about CIA agents tracking a former Marine (Damian Lewis of Band of Brothers) who might be a terrorist agent. The show delivers the core elements you expect from a military/espionage thriller, including sex, violence, conspiracy plots and clever detective work. But this isn’t the new adventures of Jack Bauer or James Bond, or even a Tom Clancy-style geopolitical fantasy. The characters of Homeland don’t fall into the genre’s four major categories: superheroes, supervillains, bureaucrats and cannon fodder. They’re psychologically plausible human beings.

You can read the rest of Matt's review here at Salon.

A critic, journalist and filmmaker, Matt Zoller Seitz is the staff TV columnist for Salon.com and the founder of Press Play.

MATT ZOLLER SEITZ: In defense of Andy Rooney

MATT ZOLLER SEITZ: In defense of Andy Rooney


Yes, he's grumpy, often way off-base and very easy to parody. But Andy Rooney is also a terrific American writer

By Matt Zoller Seitz
Press Play Contributor

When I hear people running down "60 Minutes" contributor Andy Rooney, who announced his retirement yesterday, I get as grouchy as Rooney did during his weekly pieces.

Granted, the perception of the CBS pundit as a gasbag who overstayed his welcome isn't unearned. The sun didn't rise or set based on whatever he said at five minutes to 8 Eastern time each Sunday night, and during the final stretch of Rooney's tenure — which started in 1978 and will end this Sunday with his sign-off — he didn't exactly challenge himself to explore new frontiers. He stuck with what worked for him: griping about inflation or recession or political hypocrisy, admitting that he was out-of-touch and not losing any sleep over it, pointing out life's annoyances and pleasures, opening his letters and packages on the air.

Along the way, Rooney ticked people off, and not always with his 60 Minutes commentaries. His 2007 newspaper column about Latino players' dominance of baseball ("I know all about Babe Ruth and Lou Gehrig, but today’s baseball stars are all guys named Rodriguez to me") got him in trouble, as did his 1990 TV special A Year With Andy Rooney, which included off-the-cuff remarks describing "homosexual unions" on a list of "self-induced ills" that "kill us." Rooney compounded that last scandal by giving an interview to the Advocate in which he allegedly said, "Most people are born with equal intelligence, but blacks have watered down their genes because the less intelligent ones are the ones that have the most children. They drop out of school early, do drugs and get pregnant." I say "allegedly" because Rooney strongly denied saying those last couple of lines, and there was no tape of the interview. Was he lying? Maybe. But to my knowledge, he copped to — and apologized for — every other thoughtlessly offensive public comment he made, voluntarily or under CBS duress. "That’s what I do for a living," he told the New York Times in a story about the baseball flap. "I write columns and have opinions, and some of them are pretty stupid.”

You can read the rest of Matt's piece here at Salon.

A critic, journalist and filmmaker, Matt Zoller Seitz is the staff TV columnist for Salon.com and the founder of Press Play.

MATT ZOLLER SEITZ: An interview with the dean of COMMUNITY

MATT ZOLLER SEITZ: An interview with the dean of COMMUNITY


Dan Harmon, the hit sitcom's creator, talks to Salon about comedy, agony, paintball, The Simpsons and Glee

By Matt Zoller Seitz
Press Play Contributor

NBC's Community (Thursdays, 8 p.m./7 Central) is one of the most deceptively light shows on network television — a seeming spoof of pop culture and pop obsessives that's as densely imagined as the world of The Simpsons, and that has a lot more on its mind than movie and TV quotes and self-referential devices.

Last week I interviewed the show's creator, Dan Harmon. Our wide-ranging conversation covered many of the expected areas: his sense of humor, his influences, behind-the-scenes production anecdotes, and hints of episodes to come. But it also delved into more elusive and heady issues: the role of pain and humiliation in comedy; the question of how self-referential a show can get without destroying our ability to sympathize with its characters; and the influence of The Simpsons and — yes, really — Gilligan's Island on Community. It's also the only interview I've ever done with a TV showrunner who casually dropped the word "vestigial."

Now that we've waded into the show's third season, I wanted to ask you what sort of reaction Season 2 got from the show's fans. This series is closely watched and obsessively scrutinized.

I guess my perspective on fan reaction is distorted because I don't scour the Internet for objective appraisals of the show. I pretty much sit on Twitter, which is about 99 percent positive emotional energy slung at you by fans in 140-character bursts. That's why it feels secure to me, because it balances my self-loathing and fear. I can kind of work in a vacuum. To me the reaction to the second season is about the same as [Season 1], which is people saying "It's great," mainly, and one guy per month going, "You're fat!" and "Your show is stupid!"

If you were asked, "How much of a spoof is this show, or how serious is it?" would you even have an answer?

You can read the rest of Matt's interview with Dan Harmon here at Salon.

A critic, journalist and filmmaker, Matt Zoller Seitz is the staff TV columnist for Salon.com and the founder of Press Play.

MATT ZOLLER SEITZ: Civilization gets a prehistoric reboot in TERRA NOVA

MATT ZOLLER SEITZ: Civilization gets a prehistoric reboot in TERRA NOVA


In Spielberg's new drama, a time-space rift lets us escape the consequences of befouling Earth and start over

By Matt Zoller Seitz
Press Play Contributor

Steven Spielberg has been playing God ever since 1977's Close Encounters of the Third Kind, envisioning scenarios in which individuals, groups, communities, civilizations, even whole species are figuratively or literally raised from the dead. The new Fox drama Terra Nova — which is created by Kelly Marcel and Craig Silverstein but executive produced by Spielberg, and which fits comfortably within the Spielberg continuum — could be the maestro's most audacious resurrection yet. I'm not a fan of of tonight's two-hour pilot — like most premieres, it's mostly exposition wrapped in spectacle, and it has other problems that I'll address in a second. But I can say that if you're a science fiction buff of any kind, you'll want to check it out just for the premise. The network's marketing campaign is trying to position Terra Nova as another Lost, and the hype fits in one respect. Just as Lost fans were happy to spend hours debating the scientific, philosophical and theological aspects of the show even though individual episodes disappointed them, I can envision Terra Nova sparking a similarly devoted following — one that gathers online every Monday night to bitch about new episodes after they've aired, then spends the next six days geeking out over implications that the show failed to explore.

The premise is Jurassic Park plus The Time Machine, with a post-apocalyptic kick-start. The circa 2149 Earth depicted in tonight's two hour pilot (Fox, 8 PM/7 central) is a rancid, corrosive dump. The planet is overpopulated, undernourished, and ruled by a blandly fascistic government that's concerned with stopping citizens from bogarting the few remaining resources.

You can read the rest of Matt's piece here at Salon.

A critic, journalist and filmmaker, Matt Zoller Seitz is the staff TV columnist for Salon.com and the founder of Press Play.

MATT ZOLLER SEITZ: The plot-crazy spectacle of BOARDWALK EMPIRE

MATT ZOLLER SEITZ: The plot-crazy spectacle of BOARDWALK EMPIRE


In season two, HBO's Prohibition-era drama has enlarged its scope but still hasn't found its reason for being

By Matt Zoller Seitz
Press Play Contributor

Almost every time an episode of Boardwalk Empire ends, I feel slightly disappointed — not because the hour wasn't entertaining, but because it failed to deliver the richness, depth and ambition of the great series that obviously influenced it, chiefly The Sopranos and Deadwood. This is not the least bit fair, I realize, but feelings are feelings. But then the next episode comes on and I'm giddy with anticipation again. Why? Boundless naivete? An unreasonable faith in the creative powers of series creator Terence Winter, one of the secondary architects of The Sopranos?

I don't know — but I'm starting to think maybe it's that terrifically minimalist opening credits sequence, with Atlantic City treasurer Nucky Thompson (Steve Buscemi) staring out at the ocean and coolly smoking a cigarette, watching the tide roll in bearing thousands of illicit bottles, then turning and walking back toward the boardwalk, his shoes and trouser legs miraculously dry again. The music — "Straight Up and Down," by Brian Jonestown Massacre — sounds like the middle section of the greatest single the Rolling Stones never recorded, which of course subconsciously links the "Boardwalk" credits to the oeuvre of executive producer and pilot director Martin Scorsese, and then again to The Sopranos, which specialized in touches that were Scorsesean yet somehow didn't flagrantly rip off Scorsese.

You can read the rest of Matt's piece here at Salon.

A critic, journalist and filmmaker, Matt Zoller Seitz is the staff TV columnist for Salon.com and the founder of Press Play.

MATT ZOLLER SEITZ: The lavish “Pan Am” is nostalgic bonbons for the mind

MATT ZOLLER SEITZ: The lavish “Pan Am” is nostalgic bonbons for the mind


ABC's period epic is as light as prime-time drama can get without becoming bubble-headed


By Matt Zoller Seitz
Press Play Contributor

If production values equalled artistic quality, Pan Am (Sundays 10 PM/9 central) would win a Nobel prize.

This new series about Pan American airlines flight attendants — oh, wait a second, it's set in 1963; I'll use the word "stewardesses"! — is a triumph of retro atmosphere. Unlike NBC's dreadful The Playboy Club, the series doesn't feel like a good-enough-for-government-work re-creation of another era, with contemporary attitudes, hairstyles and music inadvertently creeping in. Almost every touch is just right: the orange Tourister suitcases displayed in the opening airport sequence; the green-shelled manual typewriter that a young man uses to type a paper on Karl Marx; the crinkly chiffon dresses and 8mm camera in a wedding flashback; the way the stewardesses' blouses and skirts wrap their tummies and hips, thanks to the girdles that the company makes them wear. The opening section, which revolves around the inaugural flight of Pan Am's Clipper Majestic, has a couple of images whose scale is breathtaking: a shot of a yellow Checker cab racing up Park Avenue toward the Pan Am building, the street lined with vintage automobiles and signage; and an aerial shot of a chopper approaching the same skyscraper, every building in the 1963 Manhattan skyline lovingly re-created.

You can read the rest of Matt's review of Pan Am here at Salon.

A critic, journalist and filmmaker, Matt Zoller Seitz is the staff TV columnist for Salon.com and the founder of Press Play.

GREY MATTERS: SyFy’s ALPHAS excels in story and character

GREY MATTERS: SyFy’s ALPHAS excels in story and character

By Ian Grey
Press Play Contributor

X-Men, shmecks-men. Alphas is good. Really, really good. It's way better than Buffy and Alias were at this juncture in their TV lives, and these are shows with which Alphas shares stray strands of DNA. (But not enough to have a cow over.)

Watching the first season of this show, I get the sense that, after crafting scripts for X-2 and X-Men: The Last Stand, Alphas main man Zak Penn experienced an explosive learning curve which translated and morphed into a list of things to do the next time he creates a subtext-packed mutant narrative. With co-creator Michael Karnow and showrunner Ira Steven Behr, Penn has given us everything in the mutant group narrative that matters — the generalized outsider advocacy, the open-source alternative families, the (not-so) subtextual political commentary — and has trashed everything that doesn’t — self-important melodrama, whiny emo teens, effects that eat up millions of bucks when twenty will do. (Seriously, the effects budget for this show must equal how much it costs to develop two 30-second CG shots. Oh, and a blurry lens.)

Penn, Karnow and Behr — sounds like a midtown law firm — start us off in decidedly-Earthbound Queens, New York. We meet a clutch of nebbishy mutants whose super skills are positively small-scale. It’s their job to fight other alphas who’ve gone rogue, freaked out or become political liabilities. (I’ll return to this point later. And by the way, you should just download the whole season before continuing this column, as it's all one big SPOILER ALERT.)

The team meets in low-rent offices under the scatter-minded guidance of Dr. Leigh Rosen, a neatly dressed neuropsychologist with a passion for '70s glam rock. (An early Dr. Rosen montage is scored to David Bowie’s “The Jean Genie.” Bite that, Magneto!) Episode story-lines typically follow a fucked-up alpha-of-the-week structure. It's an idea that’s already deconstructing/auto-critiquing itself because the show as a whole balances it’s political elements (really, we will get back to this!) with a Gaga-era "Monsters vs. Them" pluck, but wrapped in the warm jammies of alternative family reformation positivism. So far, that optimism has outplayed the serious darkness constantly nipping at the show’s edges; then again, I haven’t seen the finale. I would not be surprised at all by how hard of a game Alphas plays with its audience. Optimism doesn’t mean you’re blind sighted.

The show makes a virtue of smallness and poverty; empathic character writing is free and Alphas has scads of it. It experienced a long gestation period — both NBC and ABC showed interest in it way back in 2006 when it was called Section 8 — which perhaps explains the remarkably rich backstory and mythology.

Written by Penn and Karnow and directed by Jack Bender (Ally McBeal, Alias, The Sopranos), the pilot episode already owned the combination of indie-ish overlapping dialogue, tight thriller construction and psychological quandaries that end in questions, moral or otherwise. All of these elements just became more unsettling as the season progressed. As a master class in zero-dollar genre multi-task writing, the pilot gave us a classic closed-room mystery. We see a prisoner in a jail cell is somehow shot in the head, and that scenario morphs into a ticking bomb actioner where the skills of all alphas come into play and all backstory flashbacks are relevant.

We meet Gary (Ryan Cartwright), an endearing autistic teen who can hack into any location in the wireless world, and Rachel (Azita Ghanizada), a girl with heightened senses, ones so potent she can pinpoint how many hearts are beating down the street. There's Bill (Malik Yoba), who is super-humanly strong and there's the svelte mind-controller Nina (Laura Mennell). We also meet this hunky recovering alcoholic named Cameron (Warren Christie), who finds himself hallucinating the words “TIME TO KILL” all over Times Square — on taxi cabs, buses and other signs. And so he does. Kill, I mean — the deed performed with a typically out-there alpha-skill, the ability to locate objects in space. He is an insanely great assassin. (As to how this assassination works, the show offers an entertaining bit of Rube-Goldberg-for-the-Noughties.)

Before Cameron can do it again, the alphas stop him and Dr. Rosen (David Strathairn) offers him the choice to either go to jail or join up with his group. Since his killing urge came only as a result of being brainwashed, Cameron chooses the Group. (Looking back, we see that Dr. Rosen was saving him from much, much more than a measly death sentence.)

Okay. Now, stay with me here: the creep who made Cameron hallucinate the whole "TIME TO KILL" thing is called Ghost. Ghost belongs to Red Flag, this show’s Big Bad, a radical terrorist group who believes that Big Pharma has a new drug that will cure autism by stopping the birth of autistic alpha babies. (Sort of like Jenny McCarthy, but with science and Sarah Palin’s fan base.)

In the “Blind Spot” episode, a captured blind Red Flag alpha (Brent Spiner) claims that the terrorist Red Flaggers who bomb pharmaceutical offices and such are simply outliers, part of an extremist wing of the group and out of touch with mainstream Red Flag thinking. Then again, how can you trust this guy? He's a mutant also, what with his usage of sonar to see like a dolphin. (May I add that one of the joys of Alphas is the moment [of which there are many] when you stop short and think, Am I dreaming? Am I actually seeing this?)

In an earlier column, I noted the ever-expanding, heart-breaking love Dr. Rosen has developed for his surrogates — such affection literally saved Rachel’s life in one episode. I also carped a bit that the show had a ways to go before attaining alt-family cohesion.

Consider my carping gone. The past.

Hacker Gary now identifies as an alpha. He works as a full member of Dr. Rosen’s team and he is not the useless autistic victim his mom used to take care of. Brawny Bill is married but he is coming home late more often. Rachel has moved in with Nina and both women are stronger, better people for it, not merging in some mutant codependency, but enhanced interdependency. This loose collection of gifted young people has become a true TV family — one that rivals the group portrayed in Buffy, Season Five, a.k.a. That By Which All Others Must Be Gauged. In Episode 10, "The Unusual Suspects," an alpha shows up — of course! — with the ability destroy that closeness, in particular, by mimicking anyone s/he wants, making an abomination of intimacy. The story presents us with two Dr. Rosen’s — one of them real, the other betraying the group. (Since Russell T. Davis didn’t write the episode, nobody is killed for the hell of it, and the group survives, stronger for what terrors it did endure.) What matters is there really is an Alpha Group now. The show has conjured up the romance and illusion of the fantastic family with its unbearable fragility and coming loss. (As the past usually predicates future behavior, I expect many more episodes in season two to play on this fragility.) With this episode, the show reached a new level of confidence in its story-line and captivating characters, so much that the writers felt free to enter a dark place seldom revealed in genre television. Even I was surprised by how much dread I felt — how much I was at the edge of my sofa yelling at the screen, “No! Not that!” With "The Unusual Suspects," I said, “Show, you just became great.”

Hanging over everyone, or every alpha, is the Compound, a place of near-mythological dimensions for alphas, a “research facility and prison” in southern New York state. Just the name elicits shudders of ceaseless, neo-Mengele horrors. The Compound simply puts in boldface, 24-point neon italics what I can’t myself overstate enough, which is that there is no way to even imagine Alphas without the context of Cheneyism, of waterboarding denialism, of the grotesque endless War on Whatever by Any Means. Since 9/11, TV and film have enjoyed a bumper crop of evil or ethically dubious corporations or governmental agencies — Lost's Dharma Initiative, Firefly's Alliance and Blue Sun, Michael Clayton's U-North, Resident Evil's Umbrella Corporation, and so on, almost endlessly. Those films and shows just find new black hats for faceless bad guys. Alphas is very specific: it’s civil liberties sci-fi-horror. Anyone inclined to say, “Politics, schmopoltics” can, like, say it, but it won't make that very real part of the show go away, just as Gary’s autism can’t just go away.

Alphas just wouldn’t even make instant sense, to say nothing of being believable, for, say, 1997 audiences the way it does for us. Audiences 14 years ago wouldn’t recognize the ominous cars spilling out as black op killers — would they even know what “black op killers” were? — mow down our heroes in a fusillade of tranq darts. It’s a humiliating, truly terrifying scene as Gary, Dr. Rosen, Nina, Rachel and Bill are shot down like dogs. Not knowing that these aren't live bullets, they scramble and fall, cry, run and fight for their lives, but all go down under their attacker's superior firepower. It’s just awful.

They wake, are assumed guilty for “treason” by unseen faces and are left in an empty warehouse lit by overhead lights of a sickly acid-yellow-green that made me think of other real captives, real dogs, another war, other profits. And I think the showrunners were of a like intention: the generally sickening Abu Ghraib vibe. I mean, they certainly didn’t choose this lighting scheme because it flatters skin tones.

Alphas has no time for cool science fiction-y Massive-Dynamics-style orgs. The bad guy here is a part of the U.S. Department of Defense that's grown bored with alphas that can walk and talk when Compound lobotomies work just fine to fix that — and gunshots to the head even better. That part of the DoD finally decides to just murder our heroes; they survive not because of their cool skills, but because a government operative (Mahershala Ali) realizes that if he follows orders, he’ll become a full-blown monster. When he tells his shooter to stand down, there’s disappointment in the would-be killer’s voice, like a dog deprived of a particularly tasty bone.

Aside from characters I uniformly like to the point of missing in that instant-nerd, show-fan kind of way, Alphas is basically about battling extremism. It’s a post-partisan sanity joint about acceptance, where the only radical extremism is the one that says it don’t cost nothin’ but brains, skill and heart to make great TV. Hurry, Season Two.

Ian Grey has written, co-written or been a contributor to books on cinema, fine art, fashion, identity politics, music and tragedy. His column "Grey Matters" runs every week at Press Play. To read another piece about Drive, with analysis of common themes and images in all of Refn's films, click here.

MATT ZOLLER SEITZ: Relax, PRIME SUSPECT fans, the remake has promise

MATT ZOLLER SEITZ: Relax, PRIME SUSPECT fans, the remake has promise

By Matt Zoller Seitz
Press Play Contributor

Relax, Helen Mirren fans. NBC's Prime Suspect (Thursdays 10 p.m./9 Central) is good. Not great, but good, and promising.

No, it won't erase memories of the British original, a brilliant series of TV movies and miniseries that featured Mirren as Detective Chief Inspector Jane Tennison in a career-defining role. Temperamentally it feels quite different. The premise hasn't just been relocated to New York City, it has been revamped for American broadcast network; that means shorter, punchier scenes, a faster-paced narrative and (in the pilot, at least) more reliance on physical jeopardy. The premiere's plot is standard-issue American cop show stuff — a mysterious and bloody home invasion/murder that the heroine's department thinks it's figured out, but that she considers unsolved — and it ends with a brutal action scene that owes more to gritty American action films than to modern English police procedurals. But if you can accept such changes — and if you can't, believe me, I understand — there's lots to like here, starting with Maria Bello's lead performance.

Bello, a former ER cast member who segued into tough, sexy supporting roles in The Cooler, A History of Violence and other films, is just right for this show's conception of its heroine, New York police detective Jane Timoney. She has to deal with some of the same issues that plagued Mirren's Jane and a couple of new ones. Tops on the list are institutional sexism, the pressure to maintain a "normal" home life (with a live-in boyfriend played by Kenny Johnson), and her family's proud history of NYPD service, which she desperately wants to honor and extend. But executive producers Alexandra Cunningham (Desperate Housewives) and Peter Berg (Friday Night Lights) stay true to the original's spirit but don't beat themselves up trying to replicate every nuance. It's possible for viewers who've never seen a frame of the show's inspiration to jump right in and feel as though they're seeing a substantial new work, not a clone of something.

You can read the rest of Matt's piece here at Salon.

A critic, journalist and filmmaker, Matt Zoller Seitz is the staff TV columnist for Salon.com and the founder of Press Play.

MATT ZOLLER SEITZ: Fear and Hugging at Dunder-Mifflin

MATT ZOLLER SEITZ: Fear and Hugging at Dunder-Mifflin

James Spader's debut sharpened "The Office's" dulled edge — but does the show have the nerve to draw blood again?

By Matt Zoller Seitz
Press Play Contributor

Last night James Spader took charge of the post-Steve Carell The Office with the same quiet confidence that his onscreen alter ego, Robert California, brought to his eerie job interview last spring. But what, if anything, can the series do with his invigorating energy?

In a piece about Spader's official hiring by NBC over the summer, I wrote:

The beautiful thing about that 'interview' scene in the finale was how it offered an electrifying alternative to the type of boss represented by Michael Scott, and almost everyone angling to replace him. California wasn't a fatuous twit like Michael. He was more like a decadent prince forced to live among the rabble. The office workers had to be on their toes, alert at every second and scrutinizing everything the man across from them was saying, because they could sense that he was brilliant and manipulative — possibly so brilliant that they couldn't tell precisely how he was manipulating them.

In the show's season premiere, titled "The List," Spader's California was every inch the prince, dividing and conquering the employees of Dunder-Mifflin's Scranton branch by "accidentally" leaving his notebook at the reception desk, with a two-column list of employee names in plain view. I put scare quotes around "accidentally" because California is obviously a mind-effer extraordinaire — a prospective branch manager who mysteriously replaced Jo (Harry's Law star Kathy Bates) as the company's CEO within days of starting work. ("He talked her out of her own job," John Krasinski's Jim Halpert said, "and I really don't know how someone does that.") California's list was quickly copied and distributed throughout the branch. It unnerved the workers, who didn't know if the presence of their names in one column or the other was a predictor of good fortune or doom; soon they were fighting like passengers on a crippled ocean liner trying to pile into the last remaining lifeboat. California compounded their fear by inviting all the people in one column out to lunch and proclaiming them "Winners," which of course made the other people on the list "Losers."

You can read the rest of the Matt's piece here at Salon.

A critic, journalist and filmmaker, Matt Zoller Seitz is the staff TV columnist for Salon.com and the founder of Press Play.

MATT ZOLLER SEITZ: Charlie Sheen’s wicked, wicked, winning ways

MATT ZOLLER SEITZ: Charlie Sheen’s wicked, wicked, winning ways

EDITOR'S NOTE: Matt Zoller Seitz says Two and a Half Men replacement Ashton Kutcher can't compete with pop culture's smirking prince of darkness.

By Matt Zoller Seitz
Press Play Contributor

This article was supposed to compare last night's Comedy Central roast of Charlie Sheen and the premiere of CBS' Two and a Half Men, starring Ashton Kutcher in Sheen's old role. That's not going to happen because after watching the roast, I can barely remember a thing about Two and a Half Men. The Sheen roast — and Charlie Sheen himself — all but obliterated the CBS sitcom from my mind; any details contained herein are the result of consulting notes and a DVR recording.

Charlie Sheen tends to have that effect. The man is superficially charming but thoroughly loathsome, so bereft of anything resembling decency or common sense that the media and the public can enjoy his prolonged flameout without a twinge of guilt. And yet he's mesmerizing for precisely that reason. Nobody in the history of American popular culture has built such a long career almost entirely upon being a decadent, sarcastic, horny, volatile party animal, minus any remarkable talent to counterbalance it. It's unprecedented. But it's not as if it all started last month.

Remember when Sheen replaced Michael J. Fox on Spin City a decade ago and played pretty much the same character he played for all those years on "Men"? Both characters were kin to Sheen's first memorable screen role, the raggedy teenager with bloodshot eyes who charms the hero's sister at the police station in 1986's Ferris Bueller's Day Off. As Sheen himself recalled in his closing statement at the roast, his first line in that comedy was "Drugs?" Twenty-five years later, he's still here — meaning in popular culture, and in our heads — for drugs. By which I mean Sheen is here because he needs the drugs — the actual narcotics and the drug of fame. And society is happy to supply plenty of both.

On some deep, horrible level that most people don't want to admit, that's what makes Charlie Sheen darkly attractive, and impossible to ignore, much less shun: his sheer, arrogant, delighted-with-himself I-don't-give-a-damnness. We have to play by rules. He doesn't. He's the guy who gets away with it.

You can read the rest of Matt's piece on Charlie Sheen here at Salon.

A critic, journalist and filmmaker, Matt Zoller Seitz is the staff TV columnist for Salon.com and the founder of Press Play.