Thanks, Mrs. Doubtfire. Thanks, Mom and Dad.

Thanks, Mrs. Doubtfire. Thanks, Mom and Dad.

nullWhen I learned that Robin Williams
died, I watched Mrs. Doubtfire. Right before I watched it, my mother and I stood
beneath the ceiling fan in the kitchen of her Brooklyn home. She looked at me. Mrs.
Doubtfire
, which showcased the brilliant performance of Williams as a newly
divorced father named Daniel and Mrs. Doubtfire, a snarky and sweet nanny, was
one of the many films we watched together in the nineties, after she and my
father were divorced. After long days spent at her nursing job, she would come
home to the apartment we shared then.  At
night we would pop in VHS tapes that we’d rented or bought from a nearby
Captain Video: Beaches, Terms of Endearment, Mermaids, This Is My Life, and some
others. Each film had meaning for us because it touched upon relationships
between parents and children.  I was
thirteen years old when Mrs. Doubtfire was released.   I was thirty-three when I held the
dusty VHS tape that she brought me from her basement to watch in Williams’
honor. In her kitchen we both felt for this man who
entertained film watchers like us but who suffered tremendously.  My mother is a
mental health nurse; he easily could have been one of her patients.  Often she works with individuals who are at high risk for suicide. She sees the effects of
depression first hand.  And as a teacher,
I’d lost a military student, who was warm and funny, to suicide two years earlier. The tears
in my mother’s eyes came when she asked me to remember the powerful if common
message Williams offered in the film: Children are not responsible for
their parents’ divorce.  In response, I
hugged her.

These days I understand things
about her and my father’s divorce that I didn’t understand when I was
nine. Back then, all I could focus on was
my own pain.  I wanted us to be a family
again, rather than being shuffled back and forth between two homes for the joint
custody arrangement my brother Michael and I had chosen. On a summer day not long before our family of
four ceased to exist, he and I took a walk to our local drugstore in Midwood, Brooklyn. It was a place where we’d often bump into neighbors because it was also near a
popular pizzeria, Sal’s. It
was next to Five Star Video, another video store that housed VHS tapes and
always had updated posters in the windows: such as the poster for Ghost,
starring Patrick Swayze. On the stretch of residential blocks towards
the stores, our four year age difference, which sometimes caused Michael to tease
me about my “black tooth,” one of my two front ones that was permanently gray
from a dead nerve after I fell on it, was put aside. I asked him who he wanted to live with. He said, “Both of them.” I rapidly agreed. It
was impossible to choose. We wanted our mother and father equally. 

Recently, watching Mrs. Doubtfire
for the first time in years, I found myself paying closer attention to the
parents’ words and actions, and less attention to the children’s. While I am not a parent, Michael is. So are
many of my friends. I am a constant
witness to their responsibilities, in addition to the ones my own parents still
hold. I am trying to secure a full time
job in a difficult field and economy.
They continue to embrace their roles with nothing but love. I didn’t fully see how that kind of love
could exist in life or in the film while watching it in the apartment my mother
and I shared.  I could only find myself
in Daniel’s children, viewing the three of them, and Michael and I, as victims
of “a broken home.” I was sullen Lydia,
who wasn’t used to having her parents living in separate homes. I was Chris, who resented having had a
birthday; if I hadn’t had a stupid plaster paint and clown party at age seven
with the son of the man my mother was seeing after the divorce and later
married, maybe they wouldn’t have coupled up, and she and my father could get
back together. I was Natalie, who hated how my parents didn’t get along; they’d
gone from smiling on Christmas mornings together, when Michael and I opened our
gifts, to being unkind about one another in the same way that Robin Williams
angrily delivered the line, “You’re my goddamn kids too.”  But as an adult, I understood that I hadn’t
been the only one who felt badly. My
parents had their struggles as well.

In Mrs. Doubtfire, Daniel hugs his
children when he moves out. My mother hugged us when her friend Susan helped
her carry furniture down the stairs of our home.  Standing by the couch witnessing this was one
of the saddest moments I had experienced yet. 
My mother wasn’t crying, but it didn’t mean she wasn’t hurting. She was holding it together for Michael and me. My father did the same when suddenly
he had to make dinners and manage a household on his own much like Daniel and
his ex-wife Miranda. The difference is
that the film ended after 125 minutes, and my parents’ job was never really
done. From those early days of packing
lunches, making sure we had the things we needed, such as school uniforms,
books, food and a roof over our heads, to today when they are doing all they
can to be good grandparents to Michael’s daughter and eventually his son, they stand by us. In the past I saw Michael and myself as part of
their failed marriage. I now know that
the vacations they didn’t take, the expensive clothes they never bought, and
the very few dinners they had out were done for the same reasons stated at the
end of the movie. I can still hear Robin
Williams’ voice in my head: “If there’s love, dear, those are the ties that bind.”

Although Robin Williams is no longer with us, his
roles as Daniel and Mrs. Doubtfire will continue to shine because of what they
represent to families who experience divorce firsthand. There will always be families like mine, who
have learned to adjust to less than ideal circumstances.  There will be children who need to be
reassured that “grown up problems” have nothing to do with them, and they are
still loved. When I hugged my mother
last night, we both said we felt terrible about Robin Williams. And I’m certain
that we were appreciative, not just of each other but of Mrs. Doubtfire, too.

Kathryn
Buckley lives in New York and teaches in New Jersey so she spends lots
of time on trains.  When she isn’t grading papers, reading or writing
she goes to concerts, spends time with people she is fond of who
tolerate her and her strange ways and uses Fujifilm disposable cameras
to take pictures she actually has developed because she prefers the
Stone Age to this digital one.  She has an MFA in Fiction from The New
School and her work has appeared in
From the Heart of Brooklyn Volume 2,
Toad Journal, The American, Ebibliotekos, 34th Parallel, and Eclectica and
is forthcoming in
The Chaffey Review.

Humor Is Life: RIP Robin Williams, 1951–2014

Humor Is Life: RIP Robin Williams, 1951–2014

null
Anyone who has more than a passing acquaintance with me
knows this: I consider humor very important. It can be a great social balm, a
means of communicating with others—but beyond that, it is one of the most
complex ways I can think of, besides poetry, to make sense out of the
peculiarity of waking up, functioning, and being in the world. For me, those who
through whatever gift are able to make humor their livelihood, and sustain that
livelihood over a lifetime, become like prophets, speaking the highest sort of
truth—but truth, ironically enough, that could either make your eyes water and
your nose run or make you wet your pants. So the mixture of feelings I had when
I read of Robin Williams’s suicide was dramatic. Grief, of course. Shock. Anger.
Confusion. These were all at the front of my mind, blaring, inescapable. But
above and beyond all of these, was, oddly enough, fear, whose source I could
not immediately identify. Then it came to me.

I remember being amazed, as a twelve-year-old, that
Williams could act seriously. When I learned that he had been cast in The World According to Garp, I was
baffled. But he’s Mork, I thought. Mork from Ork. What’s he doing in a film of
this stature? After all, the film was based on a novel by John Irving. A close
friend of the time, Steve Ingham, was nuts about Irving, and he had me nuts
about him, too. And so the idea that such a movie might be coming out assumed
gigantic importance for me. The fact that Robin Williams would star in it was
both wonderful and terrible: wonderful because I, like most people my age,
worshipped Williams, but terrible because I simply couldn’t imagine him being
serious. As it was, he gave a memorable performance as young human tabula rasa
T.S. Garp, up against formidable talents such as Glenn Close and John
Lithgow—though the film would not necessarily loom large amongst others, due to
its personal, small scope, I would always remember that as one of his best
performances. And, when thinking about the range of films he made over the
course of his career, it’s the serious roles that stand out most. He learned,
gradually, how to take control of the serious parts he was given, and to do so
in a way that seemed natural to him. Movies such as Dead Poets Society, or Awakenings, while certainly moving, offered lesser performances than Good Will
Hunting
, or The Fisher King, or Insomnia—where you were actually able to
forget, for a moment, that you were watching someone who, in another context,
could be continuously funny, for fifteen solid minutes, who might reduce you to
the point of pathetic laughter—and then would keep on, as if he didn’t care if
you were in pain, lying in your bed or on your sofa, in the dark, late at
night, clutching your stomach. It’s that feeling I’ll remember most about him,
in fact, the feeling you would get when watching him on stage, without props:
that of watching someone supremely in control of himself, of his voice, of his
posture, of his physical movements, but also, in a sense, anarchic within
himself, unable to sit still when appearing on a talk show, sometimes seeming
as if he were moving around a room when he was still seated, so animated, so
wise. And the irreverence: the fact that he could use a voice whose baseline
was a slightly worshipful tone to be wildly, brashly, politically incorrect, to
make fun of, frankly, anything he felt like making fun of. What inspiring,
beautiful freedom.

There’s really no explaining this death. Nothing works. He was depressed. His comic gifts masked a
deep darkness. We never knew the real man. Substance abuse took its toll.

These are all statements he probably would have made fun of. All we really know
is that yesterday, he felt bad enough, or desperate enough, or frustrated
enough, to put an end to his own life. All any one individual can speak of with
any accuracy is the effect of an event like this on that individual’s life.
This event will probably haunt me for a long time. I’ve been thinking a lot,
recently, about my own life, about its scope and span, and it occurred to me
that Williams’ public visibility began in the late 70s, just when I would have
first been able to laugh at his jokes, to recognize what it meant to witness
someone who was truly, indelibly funny. And he’s stayed present in my life
through almost four decades, as long as I’ve been on this planet. A presence like this
becomes a cultural cornerstone, a foundation, someone upon whom you rely for a
service, or a specific function. I knew that if I saw him appear in his natural
element, which was to say tossing his hilarious sagacity into space and seeing
where it landed, he could be relied upon to make me laugh, regardless of whatever had happened before I watched him, regardless of whatever feelings I had at the time. And so the fear I felt when I learned that
he died was fear of what his absence meant. And what is that? The best way
of saying it is this. It’s like cosmic slapstick: I lean against a wall, but someone’s
taken it away when I wasn’t looking, because it turned out to be a false wall, and so I’m stumbling, semi-comically, semi-tragically, slowly stumbling into darkness.

Max Winter is the Editor of Press Play.